{"id":151,"date":"2016-10-08T21:01:14","date_gmt":"2016-10-08T20:01:14","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/trafyx.com\/?page_id=151"},"modified":"2016-10-08T21:02:00","modified_gmt":"2016-10-08T20:02:00","slug":"melotte-15-3","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"http:\/\/trafyx.com\/?page_id=151","title":{"rendered":"Solar Granulation (Continuum)"},"content":{"rendered":"<h5><img loading=\"lazy\" class=\"alignnone size-full wp-image-152\" src=\"http:\/\/trafyx.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/granul29julqe.jpg\" alt=\"Solar Granulation (Continuum)\" width=\"1500\" height=\"1375\" \/><\/h5>\n<p>A successful attempt to image Solar granulation with an amateur 280mm Schmidt-Cassegrain telescope located in Central Europe. A number of post-processing techniques have been applied, including Wien filter rescale, Lucy-Richardson deconvolution, QE Super-resolution rescale to achieve the result.<\/p>\n<p>The following comparison shows that an amateur instrument still can achieve significant results if compared to very expensive professional telescopes.<\/p>\n<figure id=\"attachment_153\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-153\" style=\"width: 1078px\" class=\"wp-caption alignnone\"><img loading=\"lazy\" class=\"size-full wp-image-153\" src=\"http:\/\/trafyx.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/granul-comp.jpg\" alt=\"Comparison of typical images obtained on various solar telescopes\" width=\"1078\" height=\"1860\" \/><figcaption id=\"caption-attachment-153\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">Comparison of typical images obtained on various solar telescopes<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p>This image has appeared in\u00a0Sky &amp; Telescope, November 2008 issue, and also in the Astronomy Now, November 2010 issue.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>A successful attempt to image Solar granulation with an amateur 280mm Schmidt-Cassegrain telescope located in Central Europe. A number of post-processing techniques have been applied, including Wien filter rescale, Lucy-Richardson deconvolution, QE Super-resolution rescale to achieve the result. The following comparison shows that an amateur instrument still can achieve significant results if compared to very [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":152,"parent":0,"menu_order":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"page-fullwidth.php","meta":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/trafyx.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/pages\/151"}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/trafyx.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/trafyx.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/trafyx.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/trafyx.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=151"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"http:\/\/trafyx.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/pages\/151\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":155,"href":"http:\/\/trafyx.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/pages\/151\/revisions\/155"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/trafyx.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/152"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/trafyx.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=151"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}